The typical approach of using geophysics in the exploration stage
of tunnel planning is well established as far as seismic refraction and geo-electrical
surveys are concerned. These techniques have been used in many projects, for example, the
tunnel under the English Channel (La Manche), to locate geological changes, faults, and
fracture zones in the bedrock. Figure No. 1 shows the typical results from a seismic
refraction survey for a tunnel alignment.
During the past few years, a number of technologies
have been adapted from the medical sector and from the oil and gas industries to
geophysical exploration for civil engineering, such as tunnel and foundation projects.
Based upon the physical properties of sound and electromagnetic energy waves travelling
through a medium, in our case it could be concrete, rock or soil, it is possible to image
the subsurface conditions. The characteristics of the energy waves will be influenced by
the geology and by features such as voids, fault zones, and other anomalies. These
measured properties include the velocity of the energy, the amplitude or the quality
factor, electric conductivity of the material, and the variation of the measured
properties, and are used as the basis for geophysical interpretation of the investigated
intervals.
This new technology is mostly based upon faster acquisition systems and
the capability of processing software imaging, 2D or 3D, the area or the volume,
respectively, traversed by the survey. The interpretation of the results is derived by
solving multi-path coverage of seismic energy traveltimes and performing an inversion
process on the data. This is done to obtain an image of the seismic-velocity distribution
corresponding to the traveltime measurements and presented as tomographic results.
In tunnelling, tomagraphy is mostly used in areas where concrete and
chemical grouting have to be controlled. The geophysical measurement are made before and
after injection to determine changes in velocity corresponding to the success (or failure)
of the injection process. This technology is quite interesting if it can be constructed in
a 3D format. The technology is nondestructive, non-intrusive, rapid, and very reliable.
The grouting success can be evaluated by an analysis of any remaining voids by using the
seismic velocities measured before and after the grouting operation and comparing the
processed energy-wave distribution.
As some major project quality assurance requires proof of the
completeness of the grouting program, such technology useful in many geological settings.
As an exploration tool, tomography can be used between boreholes. In the case of a
tunnelling exploration project, the boreholes have to be placed too closely together to
make this technology a suitable and economic exploration tool. Tomography is more useful
in evaluating specific geological situations, controlling grouting, or evaluating rock
stability for short or long-term construction projects.
As applied to tunnel construction, new geophysical applications have
been conducted during the last few years. These investigations are generally used for the
visualization of the geology in advance of the boring machine or conventional drilling and
blasting, for the prediction of collapse due to the presence of voids, the position of
faults, or other unusual geological features. As in tomography, other geophysical
techniques can be used, such as georadar, to identify the electrical conductivity of
in-situ rock. Changes in conductivity are frequently associated with water-filled bedrock
fractures.
As discussed previously, new approaches for tunnelling investigations
during construction most often use the properties of georadar and seismic wave
propagation. The capability of processing the data has been derived mostly from the oil
and gas industry. Georadar surveys used during tunnel construction are very similar to
those used for ground surface surveys. Georadar can be used on the roof or walls of a
tunnel to locate fractures, establish the optimal lengths of rock bolts, and qualitative
control of grouting. Georadar results can have particular interpretational problems in
certain mediums and is also limited in distance of penetration. A more advantageous
technique was developed utilizing seismic energy waves. This technique is closely related
to traditional seismic refraction surveys and it has the same advantage of measuring
seismic velocities, which are directly related to the mechanical properties of the
investigated materials.
Adapting seismic techniques from the oil and gas industry has required
scale adjustments in the measuring instruments. Only sophisticated seismic equipment can
take the accurate readings and, in part, may depend on the features that are the
objectives of the survey. Recently, data were acquired in a tunnel in Montana, USA to
locate fault zones in advance of a boring machine. The results shown in Figure No. 2
display the pattern of reflections at the tunnel recording face 150 m from the fault. The
seismic results were later confirmed with horizontal boreholes.
One of the advantages of these techniques is that they generally do not
require large pieces of equipment, extensive setup, nor many personnel. The data can be
rapidly processed onsite if nearrealtime results are required prior to advancing the
excavation.
To complete this brief review or update of geophysical applications to
tunnelling, I would like to present a technology that is most applicable to the
rehabilitation of tunnels rather than for exploration. As more and more infrastructures,
such as tunnels, piers, and underground foundations will need to be repaired in the coming
years, a new field of geophysical surveys, microseismic methods, is developing to guide
and control more efficiently these future repairs. Microseismic methods are being used on
concrete slabs to map the weak areas by an analysis of seismic waves. Complex
interpretation can be made on the waves to solve different geotechnical problems, and the
most common interpretation is done based on longitudinal and shear-wave propagation times
to locate weak areas.
McGill University, located in Montréal, is developing with Geophysics
GPR International Inc. a complex program to establish the optimal type of survey and the
amount of coverage to assure a certain percentage of material changes to solve a specific
problem. These numbers and techniques will be different at each site depending on the
required accuracy and on the investigated structure.
Micro-seismic techniques can be used to verify the integrity of
concrete within a tunnel shaft. Generally, conditions such as fractures, voids and weak
zones in a material can be iden
tified without the need of boreholes. Micro-seismics is a much more
powerful tool than the usual impactecho or ultrasonic testing methods. This is because the
data can be processed using the same interpretational techniques used in seismic
refraction, thus having fewer unknowns in the interpretation due to the extensive usage of
these techniques applied to civil engineering.
Even now these technologies are continually improving in mode of
acquisition and in the processing of resultant data. We can also expect improved types of
measurements, which means new types of wave generation, processing, and interpretation to
reduce the risk in tunnel planning and construction.
Before planning a project, a qualified geophysicist experienced in the
above-mentioned techniques should be consulted. In fact, the overall technology is
changing so rapidly than if one wanted to follow the current geophysical research, it
would be necessary to consult, in the Journal of Geophysical Research alone, more than
40,000 pages of annually published articles. It is well known that the learning process
will always keep a non-expert behind the new technology. The qualified geophysicist shall
find the right solution at the lowest cost.