Utopia 2184:
A Green Manifesto
in the Traditions of
the Permaculture
and Catholic-Worker Movements
Foreword
This document is a work of theology or politics, not of science fiction. While essentially belonging to the utopia, or dystopia, genre in didactic fiction, my work also features extended factual asides (in many cases, historical flashbacks), interwoven with my narrative through the literary technique of voice change. My governing purpose is to instruct, not to entertain. The rather vigorous entertaining that I do undertake is incidental to that purpose, as the sugar coating on a pill is incidental to the medicine. My title is a loose reference to two of my literary antecedents: "Utopia" as a polite nod to More's 1516 Utopia, "2184" as a polite nod to Orwell's 1984.
My work seeks to convey a message of hope no less than of warning. We have lately seen high literary fiction reminding us that civilization is headed for destruction through global warming, blunders in genetic engineering, or the exhaustion of natural resources. Margaret Atwood's Oryx and Crake has attracted much notice, and I for my part have been delighted also by the brilliant realism of Ronald Wright's A Scientific Romance. My own message, however, is that destruction is not inevitable.
I seek to reach a wide readership in my didactic mission. Consequently, I have appended a section with explanations of points that some readers may find obscure - most notably, I give translations of salient foreign phrases - or which they might outright misinterpret. I am very open to suggestions for enlargements to that appendix, as readers query me by phone, e-mail, or paper mail concerning points that puzzle them.
I have also, from "Version 0002.0000" of this work onward, added a factual appendix, handling some technical points which will stimulate the more sophisticated reader. At present, that factual appendix mentions energy-depletion doomsday literature, extremely low-cost wind turbines (a machine generating some tens of watts for a lead-acid battery system can, according to reliable authorities, be built in the home workshop), packet radio (that's a candidate technology for restoring the Internet in a time of social breakdown), and energy-efficient cooking. I am very open to suggesions for additional topics. Perhaps I shall someday succeed in making the factual appendix very long indeed, a veritable "Who's Who and What's What" of permaculturist thinking.
From "Version 0003.000" of this work onward, I have added a further factual appendix, highlighting noteworthy features of our own times, as we move closer toward the perils and promises of 2184. At present, that further factual appendix discusses Toronto protests against the 2003 Iraq war and some Toronto experiences in the power-grid collapse of 2003 August 14.
My narrative method outside the Appendices relies on historical detail. I write of, and go so far as to name, individuals I have spoken with or read, or in whose classes I have enrolled. I explain the technical work of named institutions. I describe my own travels. With one exception, all such details are to the best of my knowledge true. I have checked them wherever practically possible.
The solitary exception: I have not, contrary to what my narrative fancifully asserts, had visions in which Saint Thomas More leads me through the Kent of 2184 or Saint Thérèse of Lisieux exhibits to me a symbol from modal logic. Thus, for instance, where I claim to have seen a single 2184 maximum-size (village-scale) wind-driven generator, I am writing fiction. Where, on the other hand, I intimate that such a generating assembly, following essentially the wind-turbine designs of our own day, and placed on a ridge in open country exposed to winds, may be expected to deliver 500 kilowatts, I am writing fact.
I do not in this document speak for any organization or institution, whether scientific, political, or religious. The point of view advocated is my own. I write as an ordinary Catholic layman, sympathetic to the radically green (permaculturist) and anti-globalization causes in current politics. I have particular sympathy for the traditions of practical spirituality promoted since the late 1940s at Combermere, Canada by Catherine de Hueck Doherty's Madonna House movement and above all in New York and elsewhere since the 1930s by Dorothy Day's "Catholic Workers".
I allow myself a mildly inflated literary persona. If we half-jokingly define the 'horn' to be the measure of swashbuckling bravado attained by Horatio Hornblower in those magical novels of British seafaring, then I pass through real life at the level of a millihorn. In my document, on the other hand (where I turn exaggeratedly ribald at this juncture, exaggeratedly ironic at that one), I operate, as it were, at the mildly hyped level of 1.4 millihorns.
It is possible that, my best efforts notwithstanding, some things in this document, in the particular version you are reading, are not true.
We can offend against truth in more than one way. We can tell a direct lie (as when we say that such-and-such a multinational corporation makes its primary goal the preservation of the biosphere). More subtly, we can tell a lie by implication and insinuation (as when we say that the policies of Stalin led to the death in peacetime of at least two thousand innocent people: although the statement is literally true, it implies that the number of victims lay somewhere in the thousands, when the true number lay somewhere in the millions).
If you, whether or not as a committed Catholic, whether or not as a
proponent of green and anti-globalization politics,
think you see an offence against truth, I'd like to hear
about it, so that I can consider making a correction in later versions.
To alert me to a potential problem, send e-mail to
verbum@interlog.com
,
preferably with the subject line 'error in
Utopia'. Or send me paper mail at Box 189, c/o Canada Mailbox
Services, 253 College Street, Toronto M5T 1R5, Canada. Or
phone me on +1 416-971-6955.
Among the viewpoints urged in this writing is a certain skepticism regarding copyright, and more generally regarding the contemporary idolization of "Intellectual Property". Nevertheless, I have not knowingly violated intellectual-property law in using my sources, and would be grateful to have any unwitting infraction pointed out to me.
-
Next:
Chapter the First